Feeds

97653 items (218 unread) in 22 feeds

CNN CNN
MSNBC MSNBC
PHP PHP
Deals Deals
Tech Tech
Web Development Web Development
CNN Money CNN Money
Frugal Blogs Frugal Blogs

BetaNews.Com

  • Permalink for 'eBay buys Hunch to better guess what you will buy'

    eBay buys Hunch to better guess what you will buy

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 12:01pm MST by Ed Oswald

    In an effort the provide better personalized recommendations, eBay has acquired privately-held Hunch, a two-year-old service that suggests content on the Internet based on personal tastes. The auction service expects Hunch to integrate into a variety of its offerings beyond recommendations.

    Hunch founder Chris Dixon will lead eBay's existing recommendations team, reports indicate. "We’ll be tackling all kinds of interesting challenges as part of eBay including predictive merchandising, interpreting unstructured data and creating merchant insights", he writes in a blog post announcing the acquisition. "We can’t wait to get started".

    Dixon says Hunch will continue to operate as a standalone site, and all employees will remain with the company, which stays in New York City.

    "With Hunch, we’re adding new capabilities to personalizing the shopping experience on eBay to the individual relevant tastes and interests of our customers", eBay's chief technology officer Mark Carges says. "We expect Hunch’s technologies to benefit eBay shoppers as they browse and buy, and to bring sellers on eBay new ways to connect the right products with the right customers".

    Hunch uses information from the users' activities on social networks, people they friend or follow and answers to a set of questions the service asks. From there, Hunch matches users with products it thinks they may be interested in.

    eBay hopes that Hunch move it beyond traditional recommendation services, which often are merely aggregated from previous sales of similar items but have little to do with the interests of the users themselves.

    The companies didn't disclose terms of the deal, however earlier Monday Michael Arrington wrote that eBay paid $80 million for Hunch.

    Photo Credit: goldenangel / Shutterstock

  • Permalink for 'Mobile Flash isn't dead yet -- it's coming to Ice Cream Sandwich'

    Mobile Flash isn't dead yet -- it's coming to Ice Cream Sandwich

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 11:17am MST by Ed Oswald

    Early Android 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich" adopters must do without Flash, as Google confirms that current versions are incompatible. However, Adobe says they won't wait long: a compatible Flash release should be available by the end of the year.

    Adobe announced earlier this month that it would end support for mobile versions of Flash, a move that acknowledges the shift towards HTML5 among mobile developers. Indeed, Adobe confirms that its port of Flash for ICS will be its last: future versions of Android will not be compatible.

    There is one reality that Adobe must face with Android, and that's fragmentation -- thus some users could still be on versions of the OS that are still Flash compatible. Adobe will still provide updates for those users, but only to address "critical" bugs and security issues, it says.

    In related Flash news, the company remains committed to Adobe AIR, its application runtime used to create Internet-based applications. That platform uses a variety of technologies -- including Flash -- and Adobe still plans to support it for the foreseeable future. The company also intends to support Flash for desktop applications, but even there HTML5 has made inroads.

    A survey released in September by JavaScript and HTML5 consulting firm appendTo claims 84 percent of developers plan to employ HTML5 within the next six months. Another survey conducted by Appcelerator and IDC found that 66 percent of mobile developers are "very interested" in developing for the platform.

  • Permalink for 'Go Daddy's IPv6 adoption caused a 1900% jump in subdomain compatibility'

    Go Daddy's IPv6 adoption caused a 1900% jump in subdomain compatibility

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 11:13am MST by Tim Conneally


    Network services company Infoblox on Monday released the results of a survey conducted by The Measurement Factory called the IPv6 Census, which revealed that support for IPv6 by .com, .net, and .org zones grew by 1,900 percent in one year, thanks in large part to the support by popular registrar GoDaddy.

    Last February, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) announced that the last IPv4 addresses had been allocated, and that it would only be a matter of time before they ran out.

    And in the decade that IPv6 has been around, it's been supported by software makers, popular web destination owners, and enterprise service providers. Having support from Go Daddy means IPv6 now has support from the world's largest accredited domain registrar, which is responsible for more than 50 million domain names.

    Still, the massive jolt provided by Go Daddy only brings total support for IPv6 by .com, .net, and .org subdomains up to 25.4 percent. If we were to subtract Go Daddy's contribution, there was still growth, but the total support would only be around 3 percent.

    The survey also found that less than one percent of the zones had IPv6-enabled Web servers, and that about two percent of the zones had IPv6-supportive mail servers.

    Adoption of IPv6 has been glacially slow in certain segments, such as service providers. Just two weeks ago, the US' leading ISP, Comcast announced it was doing pilot market deployments of IPv6 for a nationwide rollout next year.

    Infoblox, however, is targeting domain registrars.

    "A significant percentage of businesses run on the registrars’ networks, relying on the registrars’ systems for email and a web presence, which don’t predominantly support IPv6 yet," the company's announcement said on Monday. "If the registrars added IPv6 support for email and web servers, a significant impediment to those businesses’ enabling IPv6 would be removed and adoption gains could jump. If a registrar isn’t supporting IPv6, it creates a serious obstacle to any business wanting to implement IPv6 for its external content."

    Photo: Oleksly Mark/

  • Permalink for 'Need to install Windows from a USB stick? Try WinToFlash'

    Need to install Windows from a USB stick? Try WinToFlash

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 10:24am MST by Mike Williams

    When you need to install (or reinstall) Windows then normally you’ll reach for the regular CD/ DVD. But this is slow, easily scratched if you leave it lying around, and of, course, won’t be any use at all if your target system doesn’t have a working optical drive.

    And that’s where WinToFlash comes in. This straightforward tool will take your installation disc (Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8 and Server 2003/ 2008 are supported), copy the files to a USB flash drive, and make it bootable, leaving you with a faster, more durable and convenient installer.

    If you want to get involved in the complexities of this, then an Advanced Mode makes them all available. You can, for instance, choose the file system you’d like on the USB drive, its MBR configuration, FAT 16/32 configuration and more. So if you’re a Windows expert then there should be enough here to overcome any boot issues you might have with particular hardware.

    The WinToFlash default settings are well chosen, though, so if you prefer the easy life then you can just run a simple wizard, point the program at your Windows disc and flash drive, and it’ll take care of everything else.

    You still have to pay close attention to what you’re doing, of course. By default WinToFlash will format the target drive to make it bootable, for instance, destroying any data it contains -- so be very sure you point WinToFlash at the right location.

    And booting from USB may not always be so easy, particularly with older PCs. If your system stubbornly starts from the hard drive as usual then check your BIOS setup program for its boot settings; you may need to give USB or removable devices a higher priority on the boot list.

    For the most part, though, WinToFlash works just fine, and in around 10 minutes the program produced a bootable USB flash drive which launched without problems on our test Dell Inspiron notebook.

  • Permalink for 'TeamViewer 7 Beta: Host meetings with up to 25 participants'

    TeamViewer 7 Beta: Host meetings with up to 25 participants

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 10:01am MST by Mike Williams

    The first public beta of TeamViewer 7 is now available, revealing some major additions to this popular remote access tool.

    Many of the new features concentrate on solid improvements to what’s gone before. It’s now possible to save advanced connection settings for each remote PC, for instance, so you’re ready to work with a system just as soon as you connect. File transfer is now as easy as dragging and dropping a file or folder from a session window to your own PC. And sessions can be recorded, both as screenshots or AVI videos.

    Other additions can help you to manage complex remote control situations, with, for example, new multi-monitor support allowing you to display separate session windows in each monitor.

    But the big news this time around is TeamViewer 7′s ability to host online meetings for up to 25 people. Participants can be alerted via email, and join from smartphones, tablets or computers. Once everyone arrives they’ll all be able to view the same screen, see and hear everything you’re doing, chat, use a white board or share files. And the new ability to create a video record of what’s happening may be useful for reference, later, or to share with others who couldn’t make the big event.  Not bad at all for a program that is still entirely free for personal and non-commercial use.

    There are some minor issues to consider before you take a look at the new build. Older versions of TeamViewer won’t be able to connect to this build, for instance, or join the new TeamViewer 7 meetings. And the program is still a beta, of course, so will contain bugs: treat it with caution.

    If these are concerns for you then the good news is that the finished release isn’t far away, with a release expected in early December.

    But if you’re eager to see what the new build has to offer, then there’s no need to wait -- the beta build of TeamViewer 7 is available now.

  • Permalink for 'Okay, let me get this straight, Apple is gonna be No. 1 PC vendor next year with 5% market share?'

    Okay, let me get this straight, Apple is gonna be No. 1 PC vendor next year with 5% market share?

    Posted: November 21st, 2011, 9:17am MST by Joe Wilcox

    US Thanksgiving is this Thursday, and their friends across the ocean have something for the Apple Fanclub of bloggers and journalists to be grateful for: Canalys predictions that the Mac maker will be the No. 1 PC vendor next year -- gasp, possibly during holiday 2011. "HP and Apple will fight for top position in Q4, but Apple may have to wait for the release of iPad 3 before it passes HP", Canalys analyst Tim Coulling says.

    It's an amazing proclamation, considering that IDC put Mac global share at a puny 5.2 percent in third quarter. You'll read lots of gleeful headlines today about how Apple is going to strip HP's britches, then leap to the top spot. Canalys' magical prediction is all about counting. Is a tablet a PC? The UK-based analysis firm says yes, and adding iPad to the mix pulls Apple up from the doldrums to the stratosphere.

    I first asked the "Is Apple No. 1?" question that Canalys answers now in August 2010. The answer is hugely important and has far-reaching implications for Apple, perceptions about its future and how shareholders react in the early post-Steve Jobs era. Apple's a nobody at 5 percent, but the new kid in town if snatching HP's PC crown. Then there are the blogs and news stories pushed by the Apple Fanclub.

    What's a PC?

    Everything hinges on definition, which isn't as clear now as when I posed it 15 months ago. Gartner and IDC classify iPad and its Android competitors as media tablets, separate from PCs. They distinguish desktop operating systems like Windows from Android and iOS. Windows running on the Samsung Series 7 slate is a PC, while iPad is not, by their definition. Are they right?

    Two factors muddle Gartner and IDC definitions: iOS 5 and Windows 8 on ARM processors. IDC defines a media tablet as a slate device ranging in size from 5 inches to as much as 14 inches and running so-called lightweight operating systems, such as iOS and Android OS, on ARM processors. The analyst firm classifies tablets running Windows on x86 processors as PCs. Windows 8 Metro will run on ARM processors, so will they not be PCs then? That's a definition question Gartner and IDC must address.

    Then there is iOS 5 to consider. Over six months and several posts, I asked if Apple's tablet is a PC. February 2011 I answered: "iPad is not a PC". From the post:

    As long as iPad requires a PC for activation and to receive operating system updates, it is a dependent device. Apple's tablet requires a PC to fully function. By comparison, I would rank the new generation of Android 3.0 "Honeycomb" tablets as PCs, based on function. Multi-core processors, improved graphic performance and Honeycomb will make tablets like the HTC FlyerMotorola XOOM and Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 PC replacements for many buyers. Android has never been dependent on PCs. Account activation takes place from the device and all updates are sent over the air -- that is directly to the smartphone or tablet.

    By the "it's dependent" reasoning, Canalys and DisplaySearch are both wrong to classify iPad as a PC. Many Betanews readers have expressed similar opinion in comments, and they're due some recognition.

    Uh-oh, iOS 5 and iCloud pretty much liberate iPad from its PC dependence. Users can sync to the cloud and receive updates over the air. There's still strong argument that iPad is a PC-companion device but it's no longer wholly dependent on personal computers. But is it liberated? You tell me. I haven't used iPad since iOS 5's release. Is activation also OTA, or is a PC required? It's a small thing but factors into the definition.

    But is that enough distinction? My wife's Kindle doesn't require a PC, but that surely doesn't make the e-reader one. Windows on ARM makes definitions murkier than iOS 5, I think. Some people will argue that if iPad replaces a personal computer then it's a PC. I disagree. CD players replaced vinyl record players but they're not counted as the same thing. They're different devices recokened separately. Same is true of VHS and DVD players. Replacement doesn't make one thing the other.


    Is iPad a PC?

    Hell, not even Apple counts iPad as a PC. Tablet and Mac sales are separate. Before his death Jobs spoke enthusiastically about the post-PC era, and he referred to iPad and iPhone in that context. Not even Apple's then CEO regards iPad as PC -- if it's a product leading the post-PC era. From that perspective, Canalys shouldn't classify iPad a PC, like smartphones aren't counted as PCs.

    The definition really should apply the other way around -- tablet classification needs changing. Windows slates should count as tablets not as PCs based on form factor and function -- and why not, then, those running x86 processors. The classification is more sensible and, by that reasoning, means that iPad is not a PC and it's outrageous for Canalys to claim that Apple will be No. 1 next year based on current shipment growth trends. Similarily, I shouldn't call Android tablets PCs, either. So I correct myself. If iPads aren't PCs, neither are Android tablets.

    By the way, Canalys refers to tablets as "pads" and predicts 59 million unit shipments for all 2011 -- 22 million in fourth quarter. I won't state PC market share for obvious reasons.

    Do you agree? Is iPad not a PC? Please answer in comments below and take to poll above.

  • Permalink for 'You oppose Congress' kill free speech on the Internet Act'

    You oppose Congress' kill free speech on the Internet Act

    Posted: November 20th, 2011, 1:48pm MST by Joe Wilcox

    The results are in to BetaNews poll "US Congress is considering two new copyright bills: PROTECT IP and Stop Online Piracy Act. Do you support them?" Among the 2,560 people who responded to the question (so far), 63 answered "Yes". Who are these people? I'm surprised it's that many. Only 95.43 percent answered "No" to legislation with wide bipartisan support and likelihood of passing both Houses in some form.

    "Whenever you hear about something having 'bipartisan' support, hold onto your wallet and don't pick up the soap" writes commenter psycros. My own reaction is equally strong, and the proposed bills are supposed to protect me. I'm a victim. Everyday people steal copyrighted content BetaNews paid to produce and posts it for their own profit -- if nothing else feeding off the Google economy. PROTECT IP and SOPA are supposed to protect my writing and livelihood as a copyrighted content producer. No thanks.

    To recap, Senators introduced PROTECT IP in May and House representatives did likewise with SOPA in October. Either bill would give the government broad powers to take down websites, seize domains and compel search engines from indexing these properties. Little more than a request from copyright holders is necessary. It's essentially guilty-until-proven-innocent legislation that would punish the many for the sins of the few, while disrupting the fundamental attributes that made the Internet so successful and empowered so many individuals or businesses to accomplish so much. (Review the bills: PROTECT IP. SOPA.)

    Government's Facebook Killer

    Based on my reading of both proposed bills, some of the most disrupting and socially transforming websites/cloud services wouldn't exist today if enacted, say, in 2005. YouTube, which opened to the public in November 2005 and Google purchased 11 months later, could have been killed in its infancy because users posted copyrighted content they didn't own. The bills would have empowered the US Justice Department to seize the website and its domain, potentially stifling a new industry.

    Americans watched an average 19.5 hours of online video in September 2011, according to comScore. Google sites, mostly from YouTube, handily topped the list, with 161.4 million unique viewers. Second ranked VEVO: 57.3 million. Number of videos watched, respectively, between the two sites: 18.6 billion and 748 million. Also in September, number of video ads reached more than 50 percent of the US online population -- a milestone. But the video sites and burgeoning ad market behind them likely wouldn't exist today if government, at the behest of Hollywood, seized YouTube and other video sites in the late Noughties.

    Then there's Facebook, the most socially disruptive and empowering website/service to come along in a generation. Thirteen months ago, writing for The New Republic, Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Lessig observed that many "The Social Network" reviewers overlooked the movie's most important character: The Internet, and the ease with which it allowed Mark Zuckerberg to create Facebook. Lessig uses the founding of Nantucket Nectars as vehicle for comparing the old and new worlds:

    At each step after the first, along the way to giving their customers what they wanted, the two Toms had to ask permission from someone. They needed permission from a manufacturer to get into his plant. Permission from a distributor to get into her network. And permission from stores to get before the customer...

    Zuckerberg faced no such barrier. For less than $1,000, he could get his idea onto the Internet. He needed no permission from the network provider. He needed no clearance from Harvard to offer it to Harvard students. Neither with Yale, or Princeton, or Stanford. Nor with every other community he invited in. Because the platform of the Internet is open and free, or in the language of the day, because it is a 'neutral network' a billion Mark Zuckerbergs have the opportunity to invent for the platform.

    If either PROTECT IP or SOPA was law, Zuckerberg would need permission, and with or without it he could easily be shut down by Harvard or government intervention, simply because Facebook users post or even link to copyrighted content.


    US Congress is considering two new copyright bills: PROTECT IP and Stop Online Piracy Act. Do you support them?

    Guilt by Association

    Still, piracy, whether or not intentional, is widespread. I won't state figures here, believing most are overstated by groups like Business Software Alliance that assume most or every pirated created work would be a sale -- that's unlikely.

    Commenter Rsharp20 writes: "Piracy is a problem, and the only people who do not want such a bill are the people who do pirate". I don't pirate anything, but I oppose the bills, even though they would, in theory, protect me from pirates.

    Nicole F. sees the situation differently:

    To those who support the bill, mainly those that think that the only people opposing this bill are pirating individuals or that the bill has merit for its plans against pirating: The written intentions are good, but the problem with this bill is that is so vague and gives corporations way too much power.

    Rather than holding the individual accountable for piracy, it holds the entire website accountable. This bill gives corporations the power to take down said websites for even one comment, post, etc. that they deem inappropriate/illegal (which, might I add, would be the responsibility of the individual, not the website itself -- so long as it clearly states legal policies in line with the gov to users and requires that they adhere to them).

    This means that massive sites whose primary function are for social networking and sharing of user-created media, not for piracy, can be shut down completely (just because of a few idiots that would risk the whole website and all its users to get some videos or music for free). This is a HUGE threat to freedom of speech since many of these sites are where ideas are expressed and shared, where inspiration happens and movements begin.

    In reviewing the bills, I take away similar impression. So it's not just that Mark Zuckerberg couldn't create Facebook, it wouldn't be sustainable because of what people post or link to. Does the government have the legal authority to take down sites that link to others promoting illegal activities like drug trafficking? But, hey, it's okay to seize sites and domains because of Harry Potter?

    Protect Copyrights or Free Speech?

    But there's another way to look at both bills, as BetaNews commenter scophi observes:

    It's about shutting down major websites that are intentionally mass pirating software, products, medical prescriptions, stolen identities, etc. It's an effort to get companies to stop doing business with known traffickers. It's about closing down available outlets for pirates/thieves to trade their stolen goods. It's an attempt to stop mass criminal activity on the web.

    Additionally, IP is not over-protected here. If anything, it's the opposite, given our country's economic and political upbringings. That's why the bill is called PROTECT IP, because there's so little of it right now. The bill is looking to expand IP protection.

    Without IP, there is little motivation for R&D, authorship, or marketing. It's the basis for pharmaceutical companies, technology patents, musical groups, artists, engineers, writers, and virtually any field where innovation is possible. America is built on IP and ownership of ideas...The right to self-ownership and the ability to profit from your own efforts is the foundation of modern civilization.

    Freedom of speech and free flow of information also are foundations of American civilization. In the late 1700s, a young United States government set up boundaries for copyrights and patents, granting limited, short-term monopolies over creations/inventions before they become public domain. Let the inventors profit for a time, but allow all society to later benefit. There appears to be some conflict between free speech rights and those protecting copyrights. If you've got time, Stanford Technology Law Review paper "A Free Speech Theory of Copyright", by Steven Horowitz, is worthwhile reading.

    My question to scophi and others; Isn't Congress proposing to use a bazooka to kill mosquitoes? Should all mosquitoes be exterminated?

    In a February 2011 interview, writer Neil Gaiman offers startling perspective about online piracy: "Places where I was being pirated, particularly Russia -- people were translating my stuff into Russian and spreading it out into the world -- I was selling more and more books. People were discovering me through being pirated, and then they were going out and buying the real books. When a new book would come out in Russia, it would sell more and more copies".

    Another example predates the YouTube and Hulu era of streaming content. Back in 2004-2005, NBC Universal's Syfy (previously known as SciFi) network broke into limited streaming after observing the strange benefits of pirating. Mindjack's May 2005 story on BitTorrent trading of "Battlestar Galactica" episodes is a harrowing tale of piracy boosting TV viewership. "Battlestar Galactica" aired in the United States before the United Kingdom, making its way to BitTorrent in the between time. Mark Pesce explains the outcome:

    While you might assume the SciFi Channel saw a significant drop-off in viewership as a result of this piracy, it appears to have had the reverse effect: the series is so good that the few tens of thousands of people who watched downloaded versions told their friends to tune in on January 14th, and see for themselves. From its premiere, 'Battlestar Galactica' has been the most popular program ever to air on the SciFi Channel, and its audiences have only grown throughout the first series. Piracy made it possible for 'word-of-mouth' to spread about 'Battlestar Galactica.'

    NBC Universal and Syfy responded by streaming select "Battlestar Galactica" episodes by summer 2005. Full-episode TV streaming was pretty novel in early 2005. Would it exist today at all, if PROTECT IP or SOPA was law six years ago?

    Many opponents argue that both bills would curtail free speech, empowering the US government, or even big business backing it, to censor unwanted information online. Electronic Frontier Foundation says "this legislation invites Internet security risks, threatens online speech, and hampers Internet innovation".

    Perhaps I'm naive questioning that as overt outcome. But it's easy to see unintentional consequences, because of the potential impact on social networks that Nicole F. observes and, frankly, the way the World Wide Web has operated since its conception more than two decades ago. Still, both bills would allow the take down of websites and seizure of domains without much due process. As I asserted earlier, it's guilty-until-proven-innocent legislation.

    "Once these powers are granted they will be difficult if not impossible to take away", Betanews commenter Dirtanian warns. "Though this result has been inevitable since the dawn of the Internet. The web is like the wild west and there are those with power that feel it must be tamed by any means necessary".

    Photo Credit: conrado/Shutterstock

  • Permalink for 'Doctors can compel you to remove negative reviews from Angie's List'

    Doctors can compel you to remove negative reviews from Angie's List

    Posted: November 20th, 2011, 8:41am MST by Ed Oswald

    It's time for your yearly physical. Walking into the doctor's office is like any other visit: the same corny elevator music, the same outdated magazines, and that stack of paperwork the receptionist always hands you to fill out. But there's something new in that paperwork. Your doctor is asking you to sign a new agreement. What it asks for surprises you.

    Your doctor wants you to turn over the rights of what you may say about him or her online. Sound ridiculous? It's not and is the newest method medical professionals use to protect their reputations. One company is spearheading this effort, and has become the target of criticism for its practices.

    The Doctor Owns What You Say

    The company is Medical Justice, a North Carolina-based outfit behind what is called a "Mutual Agreement". Used by an undisclosed number of the 3,700 doctors nationwide represented by the company (Medical Justice claims it "doesn't keep track"), signing the agreement hands over the copyright of your Internet posts on ratings sites to the doctor. If a physician considers your posting "egregious", then you must remove it.

    "We don’t want your practice to be judged by two or three patients", Medical Justice founder and CEO Jeffery Segal says. He argues that the increasing criticism over its practices result from first efforts more than two years ago to combat negative reviews.

    Medical Justice then supplied its clients with a much stronger agreement -- which opponents liken to a gag order -- giving the doctor free reign to compel removal of any post for any reason.

    Segal, who is a MD, claims the company's "revised" agreement is far less hardline, and is designed to be used sparingly. "I can't guarantee that some doctors may be abusing it", he admits.

    The Reliability of Doctor Ratings May Be At Risk

    Medical Justice's failure to guarantee its clients are not sugar-coating their reputations has ratings sites upset. Of the three ratings sites that responded to BetaNews' requests for comment for this story -- RateMDs.com, Angie's List, and HealthGrades -- all say they have had contact with Segal's company.

    RateMDs.com and Angie's List are fighting back, however. RateMDs.com maintains what it calls the "Gag Contract Wall of Shame", while Angie's List places an "Unfriendly Consumer Practices" tag on doctor’s profiles that it knows uses such waivers.

    "We've been alerting consumers to [the posting agreements] and opposing them everywhere we can", Angie’s List spokesperson Cheryl Reed tells BetaNews. RateMDs.com co-founder John Swapceinski says it's an issue of free speech.

    "The contracts ask sick patients to trade their freedom of speech for medical treatment", Swapceinski argues. "It is reprehensible".

    While Segal claims in our interview that he does not contact the sites demanding removal of bad reviews, HealthGrades tells BetaNews that the company heard from Dr. Segal himself on several occasions including threats of legal action, according to spokesperson Marsha Austin. These contacts occurred as recently as the end of 2010, a year after Medical Justice claims to have changed its policies.

    All three ratings sites say they have never removed any reviews that Medical Justice has contacted them over. Doctors using Medical Justice may find themselves paying for a service with a very low rate of success, and puts the firm's business model into question.

    Is Medical Justice Gaming The System?

    Segal and Medical Justice may realize the shortcomings of their strategy. He tells BetaNews that the company has an internal system in development where patients can review their doctors at the office itself. These reviews are not shared publicly right away: the doctor will see them before Medical Justice attempts to post them online.

    This raises a whole new set of issues. What's the benefit to Medical Justice in posting negative reviews that patients may give? While Segal points out that the company does not edit reviews, one ratings site shared with BetaNews data that shows a pattern of extremely positive reviews coming from IP addresses traced to Medical Justice.

    Between November 5, 2010 and March 29 of this year, RateMD.com noted 86 positive reviews for 38 doctors in 14 states. In every review, the doctor was rated five out of five stars in every category. RateMD banned those IPs and removed the suspicious reviews.

    It is not clear whether these reviews were the result of a test of the new system described by Segal. Due to patient privacy laws, it is impossible to confirm anything about these patients' reviews.

    Ratings sites may have the most to lose with this new system since accurate reviews may be harder to ensure given there are companies like Medical Justice that allegedly could game the system.

    Gag orders on Internet reviews may seem like a clear affront to free speech but according to noted First Amendment lawyer Lawrence Walters, the agreements are completely legal. "People are free to give up their right to post negative comments by signing contractual agreements with private companies, containing such restrictions", he says.

    Walters does believe the practice its questionable. "Requiring a patient to give up his or her right to communicate about the quality of a physician's services as a condition of treatment raises some ethical concerns, even if it is not illegal".

    Patients are responsible to know what they are signing. If a doctor asks you to sign away free-speech rights, legally the only recourse you have is to find another doctor.

    Medical Justice is undeterred and will move forward. "Our goal is to provide a more accurate online picture of a doctor’s practice that also contributes to an enhanced patient-physician feedback system with better checks and balances", Segal argues.

    "This system will not only encourage more reviews, but will create a feedback loop to drive quality practice improvement and faster resolution of patient concerns -- all while fortifying the patient-doctor relationship", he emphasizes.

    Photo Credit: ZouZou/Shutterstock

  • Permalink for 'Don't miss one of this week's exciting 18 downloads'

    Don't miss one of this week's exciting 18 downloads

    Posted: November 19th, 2011, 5:37pm MST by Mark Wilson

    Another busy week software releases has passed, and chances are you missed something. Fear not, we have collected together some of the highlights of the past seven day in another handy roundup so you can catch up.

    VMWare released a series of updates to it virtualization software, starting with VMware Workstation 8.0.1. The app can be used to run virtual copies of Windows and Linux and the latest version includes graphics performance improvements as well as support for Ubuntu 11. VMware Player 4.0.1 is the free version of the virtualization tool for Windows while VMware Fusion 4.1 is more a major upgrade for Mac users, which supports full screen mode in Lion, improves performance of virtual machines and much more.

    But you may well be more interested in looking after your standard copy of Windows rather than a virtual one, and this is where IObit Advanced SystemCare 5 FINAL can help. The updated system optimization tool includes real-time optimization in the form of ActiveBoost while the re-written program uses fewer resources. Sticking to the system utility theme, Quick Erase 0.4 makes it possible to quickly and easily erase files you would rather were not seen by anyone else -- for whatever reason. There are twelve secure deletion options to choose from, helping to ensure that the files you delete stay that way.

    If you are more interested in ensuring that your files are backed up rather than deleted, BurnAware Free 4.2 may be right up your street. This free CD, DVD and Blu-ray burning tool can back up data, burn ISO images and create audio discs. Also on the creative front, Microsoft Expression Encoder 4.0 SP1 captures video from a variety of sources, before editing and converting it for viewing on a range of devices, including online broadcasts. This is an example of a program that can be made as simple or as complex as you like, and while it is possible to get results fairly quickly, there are plenty of options here for anyone who wants to get a little more involved.

    Skype for Windows 5.7 Beta and Skype for Mac 5.4 Beta both received updates this week, adding the ability to conduct video chats with your Facebook contacts amongst other enhancements. The group chat options of Skype is ideal for conducting online meetings. Whether you are conducting on- or offline-meetings, PointerStick 1.0 is a valuable tool. This free utility provides a large onscreen pointer that can be used to draw attention to thing you want to demonstrate.

    The week was quieter for browser updates -- Waterfox 8.0 released. This is a browser for users of 64-bit Windows who can’t wait for the 64-bit version of Firefox as it is based on Firefox code and is virtually indistinguishable from the more common 32-bit version of Mozilla’s browser.

    The Internet can be used for business and pleasure, and when used for entertainment, Game Downloader 2.5 can point you in the direction of dozens of downloadable games. We’ve already mentioned one disc burning tool, but Hamster Free Burning Studio 1.0.9.9 is also worth a mention if only for its pleasingly customizable interface. On the subject of eye-candy, Horloger 1.0 FINAL is an attractive desktop clock for Windows users that will appear familiar to HTC Sense users -- good-looking and functional.

    For music fans Apple iTunes 10.5.1 (32-bit) and  Apple iTunes 10.5.1 (64-bit) were both updated, adding support for iTunes Match in the United States. If video is more your thing, Freemake Video Downloader 3.0.0 makes it possible to download streaming video from an extensive list of supported sites, while a blast from the past RealPlayer 15 adds the ability to track your friends’ Facebook videos.

    Whatever type of software you are looking for, there’s something here from the past week for everyone.

  • Permalink for 'Ring in the holidays with "A Charlie Brown Christmas" for tablets'

    Ring in the holidays with "A Charlie Brown Christmas" for tablets

    Posted: November 19th, 2011, 10:42am MST by Joe Wilcox

    Yesterday I coughed up $6.99 for Loud Crow Interactive's digital pop-up remake of the Charles Schultz holiday classic. "A Charlie Brown Christmas" is available for Android and iOS from the Amazon, Apple and Google mobile apps stores -- for smartphones and tablets. The digital book delights, is more than worth 7 bucks and demonstrates how tablet apps/books should utilize the touchscreen. "A Charlie Brown Christmas" is the must-have addition to any tablet you gift. Tablets top this year's holiday wish lists.

    But "A Charlie Brown Christmas" also reveals a problematic similarity to the early PC era: Application incompatibilities across operating systems. Schultz's remade classic is available from the three aforementioned stores, and buyers will have to cough up for at least two platforms, if, say, Junior has Android phone and Janie iPad and both want the same digital app/book. They can purchase from Android Market but will have to again at Apple's App Store. Buyers pay twice if they want what functionally is the same content for two different platforms. This isn't a new problem, but visible example because of price (compared to, say, a 99-cent game). Loud Crow's "The Tale of Peter Rabbit" is available from the same three stores and Nook, too. The situation presents hardships for some developers and consumers.

    From a couple different perspectives, nothing is radically new here. Microsoft sells separate Mac and Windows versions of Office. Buyers pay twice for separate platforms, even if the software for one provides licenses for multiple computers. That said, some other products are cross-platform and usable on Windows or the Mac, such as Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (although, under ToS aggreement, not at the same time when singly licensed). Until Steve Jobs' disdain for Adobe Flash in early 2009, the technology stood at the forefront enabling developers to provide compelling digital content and games across platforms. HTML5 promises to revive some of this capability, but that doesn't help you if looking to buy Shazam Encore for Android smartphone and iOS tablet and pay just once.

    There's another way to look at this, and it's also a defense -- that the situation is status quo: Consumers have always paid for multiple platforms. So dad when younger bought The Beatles White album in vinyl, 8-track and cassette formats. Later, daughter separately paid for the CD and digital remastered downloads from Apple. Same applies to movies, going from VHS tape to DVD to Blu-ray and digital download. Consumers long have paid for the same content multiple times. In each of those examples, however, the technology changed. Vinyl records and CDs are different formats, use different hardware and arguably improves from one to the other.

    With "A Charlie Brown Christmas", buyers get essentially the same product, regardless of platform. They pay up -- a platform tax, so to speak -- for having Android phone and iOS on tablet, or, on Android, Samsung Galaxy S II and Kindle Fire or Nook. Purchasing from one Android store doesn't ensure compatibility across them -- and that's ignoring the fragmentation issue. Vinyl, CD or cassette is one format that works across multiple devices from many manufacturers.

    It's a New Classic

    I raise these concerns here and now because "A Charlie Brown Christmas" is classic remake of a classic story that hundreds of millions of people watched on television for more than 50 years. The digital book/app is interactive, like a pop-up paper title, but adapted to touchscreens. It's sure to delight adults and kids, and if other Baby Boomers and Gen-Xers are like me they'll awash with memories.

    My sisters and I gathered before the television every December to watch the "A Charlie Brown Christmas" special. Dolly Madison sponsored the airing, which frustrated me. The pastry company advertised Zingers -- coconut and strawberry sauce covered Twinkie-like cakes -- with character Snoppy on the packaging. But, argh, no stores sold Zingers in Northern Maine. This and other memories rose as I immersed in Loud Crow's delightful digital book.

    In June 2010, nearly six months after asserting no one needs a tablet, I admitted to being wrong about iPad. I didn't backtrack because of sales figures, reviews or predictions about success. I changed direction after buying iPad and seeing from a content consumption perspective its immersive qualities. I wrote then: "Apple's tablet is a sit down and focus device, as much because of size and shape as screen and user interface. The totality -- physical design and software benefits -- is immersion".

    "A Charlie Brown Christmas" is wonderfully immersive and demonstrates the potency of touch. As I've long repeated: The most natural user interface is you. Human beings are tool users. We're tactile. We manipulate the world using fingers and hands. Go into a store this Black Friday and observe shoppers. They look and then they touch.

    I purchased the interactive digital book from Android Market and consumed it on Motorola XOOM. iPad isn't the only immersive tablet out there. I really like XOOM more than iPad or Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 for reasons I can't identify. XOOM is a brick compared to the other two tablets. But there's something that, for me, is better using XOOM.

    Last night, I shopped the local Fry's Electronics looking for a case to protect the XOOM and got a big surprise. Besides iPad, I saw more than a dozen tablets on display. But when looking for a case, I found just a few for any other tablet but iPad. And there were iPad cases everywhere -- down and around several isles. I'd be stunned if any less than 95 percent of the 40 or so different cases I counted was for iPad. Now what does that tell you? :)

    Editor's note: "A Charlie Brown Christmas" is wonderful consumed on smartphones, too. Before any commenters complain, I put tablets only in headline for simplicity and shortness.

  • Permalink for 'Replace your TV with an iPad or Android tablet and Hauppauge Broadway'

    Replace your TV with an iPad or Android tablet and Hauppauge Broadway

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 5:56pm MST by Tim Conneally


    The whole idea of "cutting the cord" means a household cancels its cable or satellite television subscription and relies on IP-based content delivery methods that offer greater choice of programming. The trend often doesn't focus on users actually getting rid of their televisions as well, even though it is entirely possible with technology that is available right now.

    And I'm not talking about Netflix, Hulu, Crackle, Amazon Video, Vudu, Ultraviolet, or any of the other pay-per-view or subscription streaming video services, even though they really could turn a mobile device into a TV replacement. I'm talking about the Hauppauge Broadway, which I spent this week testing.

    It's a network-attached video receiver, that encodes all incoming video feeds into H.264 and pipes them out onto your network, making them accessible through most Web browsers both for desktop and mobile OSes. So with this device, any content that isn't already available in a digital format is encoded live for you.

    I've got to say, it's really impressive.

    If you're a "cable cutter," you can hook Broadway up directly to an ATSC antenna and pipe your free over-the-air TV channels out onto your Wi-Fi network, and they can be watched on your tablet, smartphone, or PC. Or if you have an unencrypted (ClearQAM) digital cable subscription, you can hook up your cable directly to the Broadway and do the same thing. If you use a satellite or cable set-top-box, it also works, but it requires use of the less popular IR blaster for control when you're away from the box. You can actually hook up pretty much any coaxial or S-Video output (i.e. security cameras) to the Broadway and watch whatever content you want on your tablet, smartphone or PC browser.

    Broadway also has three USB 2.0 ports, which it does not talk about in the instruction manual or on the product's site, but it is presumably designed for use with Hauppauge's other products such as the HD PVR or USB TV tuners.

    In addition to making your video content available on your home wireless network, Broadway runs Oracle's GoAhead WebServer and makes your content available remotely. Setup for this is incredibly simple. All you need to do is connect to Broadway's local IP address and enter the four digit passcode that you assigned to the box. This act verifies your device for use with the Broadway and pairs it with your home IP address. Then, you open port 80 of your router, and when you navigate to Distan.tv in your browser on any network outside of your home, your always-on Broadway device is available to you. It's remarkably easy.

    So with the combination of all of the subscription and pay-per-view streaming services I mentioned above, plus cable or OTA Television available on your PC or Tablet (iPad and Android Honeycomb/Gingerbread both worked in our tests this week), you could really make your device of choice into a perfect TV replacement.

    Naturally, there are areas where this makes more sense than others: in a college dorm room, for example, where the dimensions of the room are not generally conducive to viewing televisions over 25" in size. In these cases, a notebook PC and external monitor can serve not only as a learning tool, but also as an entertainment hub for content delivered via streaming and through Distan.tv. Alternatively, iPads and 10" Android tablets in charging docks can be used as TV replacements with a 2.5 foot ideal viewing distance.

    With a retail cost of $199, Hauppauge Broadway misses the "magic price" by a hundred dollars. However, connecting TV content to your home network and serving that content out to the Web is so easy and so broadly compatible that it's hard to deny the value that it provides.

  • Permalink for 'CyberLink Video and Photo Creative Collection 1.0 is  a bargain'

    CyberLink Video and Photo Creative Collection 1.0 is a bargain

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 12:56pm MST by Mike Williams

    Multimedia specialist CyberLink has introduced a new money-saving bundle in its latest media creativity suite, the Video and Photo Creative Collection 1.0.

    The suite combines the company’s high-end video editor,PowerDirector 10 Ultra, with its excellent photography workflow package, PhotoDirector 2011.

    The lead package here is plainly PowerDirector 10 Ultra. Not only does this deliver all the regular features you’d expect from a modern editor -- powerful import capabilities, lots of effects and options, excellent audio processing tools, direct upload to YouTube, Facebook, Vimeo, DailyMotion and more -- but it also adds extras like direct AVCHD camcorder import, 64-bit editing, end-to-end 3D editing, full HD preview, and BD, BDXL, AVCHD and 3D disc authoring, amongst other goodies.

    PhotoDirector 2011 isn’t exactly short on features, either. It’s a complete photography workflow package to handle everything from importing your images (including many RAW formats), to precisely and quickly editing them, tagging and arranging them in your library, and exporting the results to Flickr, Facebook or YouTube to share them with the world.

    What you don’t get here is any form of additional software to unify the two, no front-end menu of anything similar: both program shortcuts will appear in a Video and Photo Creative Collection folder on your Start menu, but that’s about it.

    This bundle really is all about the discount, then, but fortunately that’s worth having. Video and Photo Creative Collection 1.0 can be yours for around $99.95, essentially the same as buying PowerDirector 10 Ultra on its own, so you’re getting PhotoDirector 2011 virtually for free.  A trial build is available now.

  • Permalink for 'Amazon loses about $3 on each Kindle Fire'

    Amazon loses about $3 on each Kindle Fire

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 12:49pm MST by Ed Oswald

    Amazon is leaning on its strengths in procurement in order to make the Kindle Fire as cheaply as possible, IHS iSuppli says. The firm has begun its teardown of the device and says that the components inside offer little surprises from the virtual teardown it released in September. Each Fire costs Amazon $201.70 to build, meaning the company loses $2.70 on each device.

    Previously, IHS guessed that the Fire had cost $209.63 to build, but that was based on what it new of Amazon's suppliers and not an actual teardown of the device.

    The most expensive part of the Kindle Fire is the display and touchscreen, with a $87.00 cost. The PC board is the next biggest expense at $64.45, and includes $22.10 in memory, $14.65 in application procurement costs, $4.50 in wireless equipment costs, and $23.20 in various other peripherals.

    "Amazon makes its money not on Kindle hardware, but on the paid content and other products it plans to sell the consumer through the Kindle. This is a similar business model to wireless companies such as AT&T or Verizon", senior teardown director Andrew Rassweiler says. "They sell you a phone that costs them $400 to $600 or more to make for a price of only $200. However, they expect to more than make up for that loss with a two-year service contract".

    IHS found that Texas Instruments plays a big part in the innards of the Kindle, contributing the applications processor, power management device and the audio codec. It also uses a new touchscreen control from Ilitek and WLAN module from Jorjin. Both supplier's parts cost significantly less than its competitors, allowing Amazon to produce the Fire cheaper.

    The company also said the device ships with only 4Gb of low-power DDR2 DRAM memory. It had originally thought the device had 8Gb of memory, also shaving some cost off its initial estimates.

  • Permalink for 'Your email signature is a valuable marketing tool'

    Your email signature is a valuable marketing tool

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 12:43pm MST by Deborah Galea

    In this depressed economy, the corporate marketing budget is usually one of the first things that is cut back. Proving tangible return on investment (ROI) on marketing efforts can sometimes be a challenge. Marketing initiatives with no tangible ROI often end up on the chopping block during a recession.

    With email marketing open rates and ROI steadily diminishing, savvy companies are now turning to a readily available, virtually free resource for email marketing exposure. Many are finding that by using their email signatures in a creative way, they can market upcoming events, product news, and build social media followers, often achieving tangible and measurable marketing results.

    Some Quick Math

    Think about it. The average employee sends out about 30 emails per day. For a company of 50 employees this equates to 1,500 emails a day. By adding a corporate email signature with your company logo, you can get 7,500 views a week of your logo, branding and any marketing message you include in your email. In a year, this amounts to 390,000 views. Depending on your outgoing message volume, this number can be significantly higher.

    What Can Email Signatures Do For Your Company?

    Want to increase customer loyalty and build social media followers? What better place to start than the customers and suppliers your company already communicates with every day? By adding email signatures that not only include contact information, but also company branding (such as a corporate logo), social media links, QR codes and a marketing message, you can subtly remind customers, suppliers, and other stakeholders about what your company stands for and invite them to actively participate in your community. Quality, consistent email signatures cannot only be leveraged for customer loyalty and company branding, but can also offer measurable ROI by including clear calls to action that can be tracked.

    How Can You Add Company-Wide Email Signatures?

    There are a number of email signature products available that allow companies to centrally configure an email signature for all their employees, avoiding the need to configure each individual email client. This means that updating an email signature with the latest marketing promotion or company event is a simple matter of updating a single template.

    By pulling sender information from your company directory, such as Microsoft Active Directory, the email signature is automatically personalized for each sender. Whether you are using Google Apps, Office 365 or an on-premise mail server such as Microsoft Exchange Server, several solutions exist that either work at the client level (for example, Microsoft Outlook) or at server level, stamping each outgoing email with a signature before it gets sent out.

    Why leave this free marketing opportunity untapped? Like handing out a business card at a lunch or meeting, an email signature reiterates your contact information and leaves the recipient with a memorable sense of your company, but with one important difference: an email signature can be frequently updated, include clear calls to action and as such can generate measurable and tangible ROI.

    Deborah Galea is the co-founder and chief operating officer of email management developer Red Earth Software. Galea is an expert in the growing field of corporate email management solutions involving eDiscovery as well as the compliance issues impacting almost every vertical industry, including financial services, legal, healthcare, retail and government. She has extensive knowledge of the legal issues relating to corporate email usage and has worked in the Netherlands, the U.K., the United States and Cyprus.

  • Permalink for 'VMWare 4.1 for Mac promises performance fixes'

    VMWare 4.1 for Mac promises performance fixes

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 11:37am MST by Nick Peers

    VMWare has updated its range of virtualization products for Mac, Windows and Linux. The biggest update is VMWare Fusion 4.1 for Mac, which addresses a number of issues raised by users, including poor performance and the loss of certain features such as being able to automatically load virtual machines on application launch.

    Also updated are VMWare Workstation 8.0.1 and the free VMWare Player 4.0.1 tool for Windows and Linux.

    The most radical improvements are seen in the new VMWare Fusion 4.1. VMWare says the new update --which is free to all version 4.0 users -- comes from listening hard to its customer base, suggesting reaction to its initial release two months ago hasn’t been as universally popular as it might have liked. Some of the changes may also have resulted from unfavorable comparisons made to Parallels Desktop 7.0, which was released around the same time.

    As a result, the new update delivers major changes across the board. First, VMWare Fusion 4.1 now supports native full-screen mode in Lion. A short delay has been added when the user rolls the mouse to the top of the screen so the menu bar doesn’t appear immediately, allowing the user to use the full real estate afforded by full-screen mode without worrying about triggering the menu.

    One feature dropped from version 4.0 -- the ability to automatically launch a guest OS when VMWare Fusion is loaded -- has been reinstated after a customer outcry. The setting, the “Start automatically when VMWare Fusion launches” tick box, can be found under Settings > General.

    Fusion 4.1 also promises better graphics performance, particularly when running Internet Explorer 9 in guest mode (VMWare promises performance up to six times faster in version 4.1). Graphics performance is also improved in OS X 10.7.2, while Windows 7 guest OSes should now start up quicker than before.

    Other changes include improved mouse performance in OS X Lion guests and faster screen resizing when switching to and from Unity and Full Screen modes. The update is rounded off by numerous bug fixes -- see the release notes for full details.

    In contrast, both VMWare Workstation 8.0.1 and VMWare Player 4.0.1 receive only minor updates. Both updates deliver better graphics performance and compatibility, plus tweaks to improve the creation and use of shared and remote virtual machines. Ubuntu 11.10 is officially supported as a guest OS, while various issues -- some customer-raised and others related to disk and memory management -- have been addressed.

    VMWare Fusion 4.1 is available as a free trial download for Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) and later. Both VMWare Workstation 8.0.1 (trial) and VMWare Player 4.0.1 (freeware) are available for download for PCs running supported versions of Windows or Linux.

  • Permalink for 'Microsoft expands epic retail war with Apple'

    Microsoft expands epic retail war with Apple

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 11:25am MST by Joe Wilcox

    It's grand opening weekend for Microsoft's 14th retail store, and first on the East Coast, at Tysons Corner Center in McLean, Va. The company pulled back the curtain yesterday at 9:30 am ET, just down the way from Apple's first-ever retail shop.

    I was there when Apple Store opened in May 2001 and regret missing Microsoft Store's debut there. I lived in the Washington, DC area for 23 years before moving to San Diego in October 2007. Tysons Corner is my favorite of the Beltway malls.

    Tysons is a good location for Microsoft and demonstrates an aggressive retail strategy. A decade ago, just as Apple opened its first shops, Gateway was in the process of shuttering hundreds of stores. Gateway's retail strategy failed for many reasons, but location tops them. Gateway chose outlying areas to save on real estate costs, and most stores stood isolated. Apple chooses high-traffic malls and urban areas, which cost more but also can generate more sales and, of course, revenues. Likewise, Microsoft picks high-traffic malls.

    Microsoft opened the first two stores in Arizona and California in October 2009. The fourth opened here in San Diego in June 2010.

    Apple Store provides valuable direct customer feedback that the company can put back into product development. Even with 14 stores, Microsoft sees similar benefits. "It's helping us transition from thinking about our customers to thinking like our customers", COO Kevin Turner says, when announcing store expansion in July. Important: "Direct customer feedback from the stores". Microsoft plans to open 75 stores over the next two to three years. Apple Store tops 330 locations, with continued expansion, mostly internationally, during fiscal 2012. Microsoft has yet to make a big international push.

    Apple, Microsoft and Sony operate stores all on the same level at Tysons. Eighteen months ago, I asserted that "Apple and Microsoft stores are the future of technology retailing" -- a shift from large box shops to boutiques. Or perhaps it's a return to the past. Radio Shack helped pioneer tech boutiques decades ago. Cellular carriers have long operated singular, smaller shops. Best Buy Mobile marks the trend. Circuit City and CompUSA are years gone. Sure Best Buy and Fry's remain -- and there will always be Walmart -- but selling much more than gadgets or PCs.

    The three company stores -- Apple, Microsoft and Sony -- share similarities relevant to providing products, services and customer service:

    • Apple and Microsoft offer in-store training for using hardware, software and services.
    • All three provide in-store tech support: Apple Genius Bar, Microsoft Answers and Sony Backstage.
    • Apple and Sony sell mostly end-to-end solutions (Sony offers some third-party software -- e.g., Windows on VAIO PCs).
    • Product categories are similar: Computing, gaming, home entertainment, mobility, photography and videography, among others.
    • Microsoft and Sony provide tools or services for personalizing products, giving them a unique touch, and they're selling points.

    But there's something important that sets these company stores apart from other tech shops. Each also sells a distinct lifestyle around their products. The Apple way, Microsoft living and Sony entertainment. Heck, Sony's shops have "style" in the name.

    Two days before Christmas last year I contrasted these lifestyles in post "Talking about Microsoft Store", which contrasted the differences between people shopping there and the Apple shop a few doors down in Fashion Valley Mall, San Diego. Apple Store was busier, and the crowd younger, with lots of individuals and couples. I observed about the other shop: "Microsoft Store is where families meet". Microsoft carries that theme foward in its exciting new "It's a great time to be a family" marketing campaign.

    Have you shopped in both Apple and Microsoft stores? Please share your experiences in comments or email joe at betanews dot com.

    Eight days before Black Friday 2011, Microsoft opens its 14th retail shop -- at Tysons Corner Center, the Washington, DC area's busiest mall.

    Eight days before Black Friday 2011, Microsoft opens its 14th retail shop -- at Tysons Corner Center, the Washington, DC area's busiest mall.

    General Counsel Brad Smith cuts the ribbon on Microsoft Store Tysons Corner. It's symbolic, as Smith also is the company's government liaison.

    General Counsel Brad Smith cuts the ribbon on Microsoft Store Tysons Corner. It's symbolic, as Smith also is the company's government liaison.

    The first shoppers flood into Microsoft Store Tysons Corner. There is another draw. The first 1,000 people through the door get tickets for Joe Jonas concert on Nov. 19, 2011.

    The first shoppers flood into Microsoft Store Tysons Corner. There is another draw. The first 1,000 people through the door get tickets for Joe Jonas concert on Nov. 19, 2011.

    Microsoft Store Tysons Corner is the company's 14th retail shop. About 75 are planned over the next two years.

    Microsoft Store Tysons Corner is the company's 14th retail shop. About 75 are planned over the next two years.

    The future of computing is touch.

    The future of computing is touch.

    A new survey by Nielsen says that 27 percent of kids 6 to 12 want an iPhone for Christmas. Perhaps someone should have asked about Windows Phone.

    A new survey by Nielsen says that 27 percent of kids 6 to 12 want an iPhone for Christmas. Perhaps someone should have asked about Windows Phone.

    Everyone gets a T-Shirt on Microsoft Store Tysons Corner's opening day.

    Everyone gets a T-Shirt on Microsoft Store Tysons Corner's opening day.

    The Tysons Corner shop is Microsoft's first East Coast location. It's also in the mall where Apple opened its first-ever store in May 2001.

    The Tysons Corner shop is Microsoft's first East Coast location. It's also in the mall where Apple opened its first-ever store in May 2001.

    Photo Credits: Microsoft

  • Permalink for 'Windows Phone 'Mango' upgrade rollout nears completion, gets update on top of it'

    Windows Phone 'Mango' upgrade rollout nears completion, gets update on top of it

    Posted: November 18th, 2011, 10:25am MST by Tim Conneally


    The Windows Phone "Mango" upgrade rollout continued last night as users of the the Samsung Focus 1.4 on AT&T began to receive updates. Now nearly complete, this upgrade has taken only two months to finish and includes half of all the Windows Phones across the globe.

    Given Microsoft's position of simply being the software provider and licenser, and the fact that these upgrades span multiple OEMs and multiple global carriers, this upgrade has been carried out with remarkable speed.

    And the near-complete Mango rollout is being met with yet another widespread update.

    "We’re also sending out another wave of firmware updates from our manufacturers to select Windows Phone models," said Eric Hautala, GM of Windows Phone Customer Experience Engineering on Thursday. "Customers of Vodafone, Orange, and Deutsche Telekom in Europe will start seeing notifications for a new Windows Phone service release called 7740 that fixes an issue with new voice mail notifications not appearing for customers on some European and Asian networks under certain conditions. It also fixes an email issue associated with Exchange Server 2003. This service release is being assessed by other mobile operators."

    The update fixes an email threading issue related to Microsoft Exchange Server 2003. With this fix, the original text in forwarded messages and messages that have been replied to are now included >in the way you'd expect them to be included.

    It also fixes a voicemail notification display issue that occured on some European and Asian networks under "certain conditions."