My RSS » CNNMoney.com - Personal Finance » What's wrong with a stock-heavy portfolio?

Feeds

100116 items (1427 unread) in 22 feeds

CNN (43 unread)

• CNN.com - U.S. (36 unread)
• CNN.com - Technology (7 unread)
• CNN.com - Science & Space

MSNBC (86 unread)

• MSNBC.com: U.S. News (36 unread)
• MSNBC.com: Business (12 unread)
• MSNBC.com: Technology & Science (38 unread)

PHP (71 unread)

• Planet PHP (11 unread)
• Nettuts+ (60 unread)

Deals (1184 unread)

• Techbargains.com (358 unread)
• dealnews - 20 most recent deals. (567 unread)
• xpBargains.com (148 unread)
• GottaDeal.com - Why Pay Retail? (111 unread)

Tech (6 unread)

• broadbandreports.com (3 unread)
• BetaNews.Com (3 unread)

Web Development (36 unread)

• Dev Shed - The Open Source Web Development Site (1 unread)
• Dev Articles - Programming Help and Tutorials for all development technologies (35 unread)
• developer.com

CNN Money (1 unread)

• CNNMoney.com (1 unread)
• CNNMoney.com - Economy News
• CNNMoney.com - Personal Finance

Frugal Blogs

• Frugal Dad
• The Simple Dollar

CNNMoney.com - Personal Finance

• 

  What's wrong with a stock-heavy portfolio?

  Posted: January 4th, 2012, 10:16am MST

  I am 35 and consider myself an aggressive investor. I have at least 90% of my money in stock mutual funds. Am I being reckless by not putting more in bonds and cash? I've heard that a good rule of thumb is to limit your stock percentage to 110 less your age. But I feel like I will be giving up so much in potential gains. -- Chris Nowicki, Flat Rock, Mich.